Michigan State University Data Science Capstone.
For this exercise your groups will review one of the case studies in your handout. However, to get some practice, you instructor will lead the entire class in the first case study to give you an idea what you should be doing.
As a group, spend about 30 minutes to review the handout of the remainder of the case studies. You should have time to get through about three (3) of them (more is fine). We don’t want all groups to do the same studies so start with the case study in the table below. Spend about 10 minutes per case study by doing the following:
Team | Case |
---|---|
MSU - Healthy City Assessment | 2. Case Study: Visit from the CEO |
TechSmith - Healthy and Engaged User Data Exploration | 3. Case Study: Conference Presentation |
HFH - Revenue Cycle | 4. Case Study: Team Conflict |
HFH - Pre / Post Operative Comparison | 5. Case Study: Data Overload |
TwoSix - Public Feedback on Environment | 6. Case Study: What is the best accuracy? |
QSIDE - Act-Now | 7. Case Study: Not Enough Training Data |
HFH - Motion Tracking | 8. Case Study: Working Alone |
Grassroots | 2. Case Study: Visit from the CEO |
MSU - Justice for Otego | 3. Case Study: Conference Presentation |
HAP - At Risk Populations | 4. Case Study: Team Conflict |
HFH - Imaging QC | 5. Case Study: Data Overload |
MSU - Grapes | 6. Case Study: What is the best accuracy? |
CEPI - Effective Communications | 7. Case Study: Not Enough Training Data |
Documenters - Leadership Dossiers | 8. Case Study: Working Alone |
MSU - University Wellness Database | 2. Case Study: Visit from the CEO |
This is a team paring exercise. Your instructor has put you into the following team of teams (aka Tripod).
Tripod | Team A | Team B | Team C |
---|---|---|---|
1 | CEPI | HFH_RC | MSU_WD |
2 | HFH_MT | HFH_QC | MSU_GR |
3 | HAP | HFH_PP | TechSmith |
4 | Documenters | Grassroots | TwoSix |
5 | MSU_HC | MSU_JO | QSIDE |
In a circular path, review the team charter for the other teams. Have someone from the team that wrote the team charter present it to another team (10 minutes). Discuss key features and how you try to anticipate challenges for the semester. Have the reviewing team brainstorm ideas to make the charter even better. Type up your feedback and share with the other groups.
In the last 10 minutes of class your instructor will have groups share what they learned with the class. The important outcome will be ideas you think are good to add to the team charter to help anticipate challenges that may occur throughout the semester.
The next deliverable is the project plan and schedule. Teams will use this time to read though the assignment and work on getting ready for the next steps.
Written by Dr. Dirk Colbry, Michigan State University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.